The 2007 SATU Review of Summer Movies (Part IV)
Note: This Part IV of a four part column.
Part IV:
After a lengthy introduction and the review of many films, here is Part IV of the 2007 SATU Summer Movie Review.
The SATU star rating:
5 stars: Masterpiece. This rating is very rare and is only given to special films that change cinema, redefine their respective genre, or create a new genre altogether. A 5-star film demands a special edition DVD purchase.
4 stars: Excellent. This rating ensures the directing, writing, and acting are of the highest quality. This rating warrants a DVD purchase.
3 stars: Good. This rating says that the film is made well enough to entertain and while it may not always deserve a DVD purchase, it will make a solid rental.
2 stars: Fair (or average). This rating shows that the film has its good and bad points. The film can entertain a times, but has its share of flaws. Rent at your own risk.
1 star: Poor. This rating is a red flag that tells you to stay clear of it. Do not rent. If a friend rents it and invites you over, tell them you are busy. Well, unless you are sexually attracted to that particular friend.
0 stars: Feces. This rating ensures that the film is garbage. All copies of should be burned. Or at the very least, the DVDs should be made into drink coasters.
Transformers: Now for most guys, this movie was highly anticipated. But I am not most guys.
As soon as I saw that Michael Bay was set to direct this movie, I wanted to orchestrate a hit on him. I did not want him to ruin a cherished piece of my childhood, which was a was show with cool Japanese inspired animation and crappy voice acting called Transformers.
Transformers was a killer show growing up and it explains a lot about men in general. Just like the film Dirty Dancing says a lot about women in general.
Dirty Dancing/Transformers corollary: Very many women love Dirty Dancing, even though it is a flawed film filled with mediocre directing, bad writing, and piss poor acting. Regardless of its numerous flaws that fans (of Dirty Dancing) are more than ready to acknowledge, women still love this film.
Well, very many women love their boyfriends, even though they can be flawed with mediocre listening skills, bad set of morals, and piss poor decision making. Regardless of their numerous flaws that women are more than ready to acknowledge, women still love their boyfriends.
Transformers was pretty much almost every young boy's favorite cartoon in the '80s, replacing He-Man and the Masters of the Universe and the anime hit, Voltron. Eventually, Transformers was replaced by another wonderful piece of Japanese animation, Thundercats. And then a few years down the road, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles would trump them all.
For most kids born from 1977 to 1982, this marked the era of great cartoons that were marketed with great toys, and eventually parents growing insane trying to keep up with the interest of their boys. It seemed as if boys could not be satisfied with any set of toys for a long period of time, no matter how great they were to begin with. And that pretty much sums up how men are with women.
Anyway, as for this movie, it is highly flawed. It's a Michael Bay film, which means it is big, loud, and stupid. At one point, I was so overwhelmed by action, I wanted the film to slow down a bit so I could regroup and catch by breath. Sometimes, there was so much CGI going on at once, it was hard to follow what was happening. Regardless, as flawed as it was, it was enjoyable.
Everything is cyclical. Now the young boys of today have their Dirty Dancing. And older men, such as myself, have something to bring us back to our childhood.
Nobody puts Optimus Prime in the corner.
Rating: 3 stars.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: I cannot believe that the movie world has now experienced the release of not one or two, but five Harry Potter films. I remember back in 2001, when the first film was released and wondering what the hell the big deal was all about.
I went to the first movie, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, and enjoyed it. The die hard Harry Potter fans (idiots) complained that it sucked, even though it was exactly like the book.
The following year, I went to the second movie, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, and enjoyed it more than the first. The die hard Harry Potter fans (morons) hated it, even though it was exactly like the book.
After two entertaining films (at least to me) that set a solid foundation for the HP franchise. Christopher Columbus gave up the director's chair in an effort to stay behind the scenes and produce. The die hard Harry Potter fans (twits) rejoiced.
The third film saw the mega talented Alfonso Cuarón take over the franchise and he delivered Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, which could arguably be the best Harry Potter film to date. The die hard Harry Potter fans (imbeciles) hated it because was not exactly like the book. They were upset that Cuarón opted to cut some of the book out of the finished film.
The fourth film, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, brought in a new director, Mike Newell. He also opted to cut out a lot of the fat from the book in order to deliver a highly entertaining action extravaganza. The die hard Harry Potter fans (nitwits) hated him for it.
So here we are at the fifth film, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix that features a new director, David Yates and a new writer, Michael Goldenberg, who replaces the writer of the first four films, Steve Kloves.
And well, this was a terrible idea. Somehow, Yates and Goldenburg manage to take the longest HP book in the series and adapt it into the shortest HP movie to date. Oh yeah, this was also the worst HP movie to date as well.
Wow. This movie really sucked. It is really slow. The movie basically repeats and rehashes everything fans of the franchise have seen in the first four films. We do not learn anything new that moves the plot along further, except for two small things:
***SPOILERS AHEAD***
1) Harry's biological parents were really mean to Severus Snape.
2) Sirius Black dies.
***END OF SPOILERS***
I spent $10 to see learn two new things that barely push the plot forward. With that said, if you want to save $10 and 138 minutes your life, go back and read those two spoilers.
Oh yeah, die hard Harry Potter fans (dummies) hate it because so much of the book was cut out.
Clearly, I am not a big fan of Harry Potter aficionados. Why?
Because they swear Harry Potter is some sort of amazing literary achievement. They are books written for children. They are unhappy if a movie is exactly like the book and they are unhappy if the a movie is not exactly like they book. Essentially, they are never happy with the handling of silly children's fantasy books. Get over yourselves.
Anyway, the movie really sucked. I read that they are bringing back David Yates as director. I just hope they bring back the old writer to steer the franchise back in the right direction.
Rating: 1.5 stars.
The Simpsons Movie: The show rocks 22 minutes at a time, pretty much every single time. Can it be done four times in a row with a cohesive plot?
Of course! We're talking about Homer, Marge, Bart, Lisa, Maggie, and the rest of the Springfield gang.
Anyway, if you like the Simpsons, then go watch this movie. If you not like the Simpons, then don't go watch this movie. And if you have never heard of the Simpsons until now, welcome to planet Earth. I hope enjoy my writing.
Rating: 3 stars.
The Bourne Ultimatum: The first release, The Bourne Identity, was not very impressive, but it delivered enough (2.5 stars) to merit a sequel. The sequel, The Bourne Supremacy, was a definite improvement on the first film and it showed the franchise was heading in the right direction.
So here we are, the third and, supposedly, final film in the franchise. Well, this is the best movie in the series. It rocks from beginning to end. It delivers creative action scenes and loads of suspenseful sequences. And yet again, Matt Damon brings the acting goods.
Matt Damon is clearly a talented actor, but why is he being considered for the "Sexiest Man Alive" award. Really?
He is not very attractive. He looks like an ugly, overgrown elf. Then again, People magazine once named the 30-year old Ben Affleck the sexiest man alive in 2002, the 51-year old Nick Nolte in 1992, and the mega bald and fat 59-year old Sean Connery in 1989.
Anyway, The Bourne Ultimatum is one of the better movies of the summer. Go watch it, even if Matt Damon looks like an ugly, overgrown elf.
Rating: 3.5 stars.
Rush Hour 3: When Rush Hour was released in 1998, it made history. It featured two minority actors in the lead roles. I remember really enjoying it and the soundtrack, which featured the song "Can I Get A…" that featured three artists with interesting stories.
1) Jay-Z: After the death of Tupac and Biggie, he went on to become the best rapper alive, take over hip-hop, release a successful clothing line, date one of the hotter pop stars in recent memory (Beyoncé), retire, and eventually return to recording albums. And he did all this while being really ugly.
2) Ja Rule: Became one of, if not the most, annoying rapper in history. His career was pretty much ended by Eminem and Dr. Dre in 2004. But he did manage to sell millions of records and star in movies for an extended period of time. And he did all of this while being mildly retarded.
3) Amil: She pretty much set the template for women I would date in the future: Annoying to listen to, but nice to look at.
Whatever happened to her?
Anyway, a sequel was not necessary, but in 2001, Rush Hour 2 was released and in a terrible year for summer movies, it ended up being a bright spot.
That movie was a farewell to both Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker. Chan went on to make terrible American movies and was barely heard from again. Chris Tucker was thrown in jail for extorting $20 million from New Line Cinema.
Kidding. Well, sort of.
He actually just demanded $20 million for Rush Hour 2 and they paid him. He then disappeared for 6-years. He pulled a "Dave Chappelle," before Dave Chapelle pulled a "Dave Chapelle."
Anyway, it is 2007 and Chan is back. And so is Tucker, for another $20 million. Well, since Chris Tucker obviously thinks he is A-list, $20 million material I have boycotted this movie so he is humbled and starts doing new and more exciting projects. I wish I was kidding.
Oh yeah, another reason for my boycott of this summer movie is because Brett Ratner, the director of the first two RH movies is back for the third installment. But after what he did to the X-Men franchise back last year, I am boycotting his future films until he apologizes to all of the fans or makes something worth watching.
Rating: N/A
Superbad: A few years ago, two 14-year old boys wrote a screenplay about themselves. One of the two boys ended up making it in Hollywood as an actor. His name is Seth Rogen and he is ready to explode into the mainstream. And no, that is not in reference to his weight.
The movie is filled with references from '80s. I have come to conclusion this movie takes place in the late '90s and this is when Seth and Evan are graduating. The only anachronism I could find was them referencing Shakira, who became popular in America in 2001. But hey, she was an international superstar before then, so yeah, this could very well still take place in the late '90s.
Anyway, this is a killer comedy. It will make you laugh a lot.
I am McLovin'.
Rating: 3.5 stars
Halloween: Why would I want to watch a remake of a classic movie John Carpenter did it right the first time.
Sorry, Rob Zombie.
Rating: N/A
Well, that's it. The summer has ended and so have the summer movie releases for this year. SATU will be back next year with another set of summer movie reviews.
Well, that is if I do not die from a popcorn butter induced heart attack.
ARCHIE GARCIA watches way too many movies and needs more exercise. E-mail him your comments, questions, and suggestions to sexandtheuniversity@hotmail.com
